Lets face it, it’s never what they say they’ll do but what they actually do. Why is it that lying “perjury” is allowed by the top person in government? We see this time and time again that laws are only for the public and often abused and ignored by government. Even our courts are a joke which are based on money not justice. It’s all about getting you to believe their lies and if you discover this fact they’re not held accountable.
Many people did not vote because they did not approve of either candidate. Why does it always have to be about money? We need it to be about honesty, integrity and a person who has the highest morals that are not affected by greed or cash.
President Donald J. Trump preached his populist and nationalist gospel in his first speech as the nation’s 45th chief of state, pledging an “America first” creed.
“The forgotten men and women of this country will be forgotten no longer,” the businessman and former reality television star said in front of the U.S. Capitol on Friday.
As raindrops fell on the crowd gathered on the National Mall, Trump said he planned to “transfer power from Washington, D.C.” to the people, taking swipes at longtime politicians, some of whom stood just over his shoulder. He told Americans that “you will never be ignored again,” repeating his campaign pledges to push companies to return jobs to the U.S. and to rebuild American infrastructure.
“We must protect our borders from the ravages of other countries making our products, stealing our companies, and destroying our jobs,” Trump said. “Protection will lead to great prosperity and strength. I will fight for you with every breath in my body and I will never ever let you down.”
“Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people.”
A look at 10 of the key promises Trump made for his first day as president:
1. Introduce a constitutional amendment for congressional term limits.
2. Freeze hiring for the federal government to reduce payrolls, although the military, public safety and public health agencies would be exempt.
3. Ban White House and congressional officials from becoming lobbyists for five years after they leave the government.
4. Announce plans to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico or withdraw from the deal.
5. Formally withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
6. Lift restrictions on mining coal and drilling for oil and natural gas.
7. Remove any Obama-era roadblocks to energy projects such as the Keystone XL pipeline.
8. Cancel U.S. payments to U.N. climate change programs and redirect the money to U.S. water and environmental infrastructure.
9. Stop all federal funding to “sanctuary cities,” places where local officials don’t arrest or detain immigrants living in the country illegally for federal authorities.
10. Suspend immigration from regions associated with terrorism where vetting is difficult.
How Juries are Manipulated to Help Police get away with Murder? In fact this goes deeper how judges can make up their own laws and rules to make them immune if found to have accepted bribes.
Imagine you tax paid public servant is bribed with your tax dollars to rule against you in court?
What’s worse is what the California Legal Bar does to ANYONE WHO EXPOSES THEM, the disbar them. Sound familiar as this is what Law Enforcement does to anyone who exposes them. Good luck finding the so called “Good Cop” who has his life salary on the line.
If you’re amazed how a cop can shoot someone in the back, plant evidence and have it all caught on video only to be found “NOT GUILTY” then you’re not alone.
What the public needs to understand is how easy it is for a judge to manipulate a jury. Remember the judge decides what is admitted as evidence, even how a case can be. What the jury should look at and what they should ignore are all things judges influence.
Recently there was a case where a Los Angeles County Sheriff over-reacted and put a gun to an unarmed man’s head. It was all caught on video and audio with the exception of what took place after the man was removed from his vehicle.
Basically what happened to Ken Sheppard
How the officers made up their own story what took place, manipulated the scene and evidence as well as stopping the recording process to cover their actions. This is actually very common.
The victim later filed a lawsuit against the county of Los Angeles and who do you think won? What more people need to be aware of is the fact it’s been proven that almost all Los Angeles county judges accept bribes from the county so they’ll rule in the counties favor. It’s so obvious and done with your tax dollars yet no one stops it.
The state even went to far as to make up a law which protects dishonest judges if they’re found to have committed crimes.
Now keep this in mind when watching the video done after the trial by Jasmyne Cannick. You’ll note the trial was manipulated by the judge so the jury had no choice.
This video is what initially happened to Ken Sheppard PART ONE
What initially happened to Ken Sheppard PART TWO
Now listen to what happened during the trial and how the county won and twisted the facts
This is the COMPLETE Ken Sheppard video
As far as the county of Los Angeles bribing judges and whose behind it read on or GOOGLE “Attorney Richard Fine”
Lawmakers seem indifferent to the system of corruption that has become a way of life in the state’s judicial system.
In January 2016 Dr. Richard Fine, Ph.D.; JD, was interviewed to learn about his efforts to expose the system of judicial bribery in California. In that article, I explained how Dr. Fine was caught up in a brutal battle of retaliation created against him by California judges, because he publicized unlawful payments given to those judges.
The payments were given by county governments to superior court judges who were employees of the State of California and receiving a full salary for their work. He was unlawfully jailed for 18 months under coercive confinement and had his law license revoked for speaking out against this corruption. Please read the previous article for the full details:
Unlawful Payments to Judges are Called Bribes
The unlawful system of “supplemental compensation” paid to California superior court judges began in the 1980s. Even though these payments have been declared illegal by the courts, county governments continue to make these payments to judges today.
In California, judges are paid a salary by the state government to provide impartial services. However, in approximately 30 of the 58 counties, the judges receive supplemental benefits in the form of annual payments from county government.
We are not talking about small amounts of money. In Los Angeles County, for example, annual payments to judges are in excess of $57,000 per year.  90% of judges in California receive these supplemental payments. 
The official position taken by Los Angeles County is that these payments are part of an incentive program to attract highly qualified judges and to retain them in their positions.  The problem is that judges are elected and are not attracted or retained by these payments. Instead, the payments function as bribes for favorable court decisions benefiting the county governments that pay the money.
READ THE FULL STORY: LA County Bribing Judges Declared Illegal: But Who Will Uphold Justice in LA?
Counties Continued to Increase the Supplemental Payments to Judges
When the terms of all judges expired in January of 2013, the counties did not discontinue the payments and they did not keep them at 2008 levels. Instead, they continued to increase the payments.
The payments are once again illegal, because the counties overstepped their authority by increasing payments given to judges after 2009. Only the California legislature has the exclusive authority to adjust payments to its judges. When the legislature passed the 2009 law, they in effect set a new compensation level for judges that was to remain in effect until January 2013 and was not to be modified by the counties.
What is SBX211 which was written behind the backs of everyone to help judges get away with crime “Yes to be ABOVE THE LAW”.
This bill would provide that no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a governmental entity prior to the effective date of this bill on the ground that those benefits were not authorized under law. Given to Judges for taking bribes. (SBX211)
SBX211 Retro Active Immunity given to California judges for openly taking bribes. Judges are employees of the State they receive their pay and benefits from the State. The Los Angeles Superior court judges are currently receiving an additional $57.688,00 from the county of Los Angeles. there is no bigger user of the court than L.A. County.(A party to the case and has a financial interest in most cases in the courts) Those payments were found to be unconstitutional / illegal in Sturgeon vs Los Angeles County. After that decision the judges paid a lobbyist to pass SBX211 ( RETRO ACTIVE IMMUNITY )
SBX211 does not restore due process
SBX211 violates Article 1 section 9
SBX211 violates the 14th amendment (no equal protections)
SBX211 violate checks and balances between legislative and Judicial powers.
Judges do not disclose the county payments at the onset of any trial where the county is either a party to the case or has a financial interest. (Judges violate Judicial codes of ethics)
Judges refuse to recuse themselves when requested under CCP170
Judges find themselves unbiased and then file an order striking statement.
Not only do judges get paid a state salary of $178,789.00 a year with medical and retirement benefits up to 75% of their salary, with the county payments the Los Angeles Superior court judges are the highest paid judges in the Nation. Los Angeles County takes tax payer money and then gives the judges that money to only have the judges rule against the tax payer in favor of L.A. County or the County’s interest. THE BRIBES WORK.
Why was an attorney locked in jail for over a year without any charges, was this extortion and what happened to that judge?
Richard Fine interview how Los Angeles County Judges are bribed to rule against the public
What happened to the judge who tried to stop Richard Fine? Plus ever notice not one judge or anyone involved in these crimes is every investigated or prosecuted? Well who would do that? The police who are protected by the judges or the judges who are protected by the police?
Just like law enforcement they never prosecute or investigate them because that would expose everything. So what they do is claim “We investigated ourselves however we can’t reveal what actions we took”. What happens is there is no investigation and instead that judge is allowed to retire with full benefits to go on working somewhere else. Judge David Yaffee Retires
Remember X LAPD officer Christopher Dorner, well you can imagine how angry he was when he did the right thing and took his case to court and lost. How can you lose? Dorner as many others find out the hard way the judges are bribed to rule in favor of the county. What did he do to get justice? Before you judge think about having your life destroyed, your made into a monster via lies and a corrupt system. You’re fired, yet you did the right thing and told the truth.
Why is Santa Clara County Hiding the deaths of Robert Moss and Charles Copeland?
Good question and which opens up a huge can of worms for a California county which has had it’s share of scandals and corruption.
We’ve come into information from numerous sources which points to judges, police and government using their authority to hide crime, corruption and even murder.
Santa Clara County Judge Socrates Manoukian Influences Authorities to Harass those who Report Evidence of Abuse
This was posted to a News Story at Salem News
Dad’s final request November 14, 2016 10:47 am (Pacific time)
In Memory of a VETERAN who has FALLEN DEFENDING HIS RIGHTS, IN THE COUNTRY HE SERVED. My father CHARLES S. COPELAND was a Navy Vet, retired from NASA. I witnessed the public guardian Shawn Parr laughing and stating “it’s like stealing candy from a baby!” outside the courthouse when they conserved my Dad, after falsely stating he was not a vet!!! They transferred 10 million in assets to Hai P Tran, the VP of Fidelity, the Trustee for Santa Clara. Mortgage Companies were used to immediately remove all equity, and my father died fighting to recover his estate which was distributed through Tran to associates of the County’s family trusts. My father was left dead in Tran’s house for 3 weeks, and the DA refused to investigate! He failed to appear, after asking for expert opinion of evidence presented by Tran’s attorney, Ann Nguyen of Robinson and Wood. I filed complaints against Judge Grilli who granted final assets to Tran’s relative (which were not conserved) with the Commission on Judicial Performance, and the President Erica Yew recused herself because she was a Partner of Robinson and Wood, and sits on the bench with Grilli, approving final distributions of conserved assets. Robinson and Wood also represents the mortgage companies used to remove all equity from estates. Attorney John Foley was assigned special notice as conservatee’s attorney, and Michael S. Miller was used to transfer all assets to Tran, with the Public Guardian’s approval. Coincidentally, M.S. Miller lost his license to elder fraud, (assoc of Grilli’s former partner?? through Miller & Grilli???)! This proves lack of judicial oversight and possible RICO actions. Grand jury reports revealed over 70 million in unaccounted public guardian assets!!! They also investigated the coroner’s office which had 3 coroner’s quit due to corruption the year my dad was found dead in Tran’s relative’s house where they left him for 3 weeks while they finished stealing everything he ever worked for. They are organized crime! Tran has hundreds of similar transactions throughout every county in CA through Fidelity etal! William Foley is the Chairman of Fidelity (rel of John Foley?), Michael Miller has a PAC, LLC. I believe its a corrupt political funding machine!!! Manoukian was the last judge to preside in the case prior to my father’s suspicious death!!! Tran was arrested in Santa Clara and taken back to O.C. for hiring a hitman around the same time! see news report! They are organized, experienced, and believe they are above the law, because they have infiltrated and abused it for their own financial gain!!! They are all taking a piece of the pie. They have their corrupt people in place! 2 doors were kicked in and I got a call from a man names John Zimmerman (Pres. of Robinson and Woods!) after filing my complaint! My Dad’s final request for expert opinion of his case evidence will be fulfilled!!!
Public defender conspired in manslaughter cover up
In 2012, district attorney homicide prosecutor James Leonard swept the Robert Moss manslaughter case under the carpet,. then in 2014, he framed Cary Andrew Crittenden for exposing it.
Fraudulent motion to disqualify district attorney (case c1493022) filed by deputy public defender Amanda Parks ( docket no. c1493022 ) concealed nature of James Leonard’s involvement & portray Leonard as “victim”, when he’s actually the perpetrator.
Amanda Parks criminal violations include perjury, conspiracy and accessory to manslaughter )
Help get attention to these crimes by Requesting an outside investigation, email: firstname.lastname@example.org Note: As of date of this publication, Amanda parks is now employed with Santa Clara County’s Alternate defender’s office.
The California state legislature recently passed three new bills intended to increase oversight and restrictions on campaign finance, a major avenue for California corruption. Those bills aim to reduce corruption by:
Creating an ethics ombudsman.
Revising the Senate’s code of conduct to protect whistleblowers.
Banning receipt of campaign funds during the final month of the legislative session.
Other proposals include:
Banning lawmakers from receiving recreational-type gifts.
Making legislative documents more accessible to open records requests (transparency).
Prohibiting lobbyists from holding fundraisers at their homes.
Empowering the California Fair Political Practices Commission(FPPC) to regulate politicians’ practices before as well as after elections to decrease campaign violations.
Establishing an independent commission to provide oversight of the Senate.
Instituting a ban on receiving campaign contributions during the final 100 days of the legislative session.
Modernizing the outdated Cal-Access political finance and lobbying database so that it is less cumbersome.
Public Reform: Whistleblower Protections and Greater Transparency
Two overarching informational problems need to be addressed in response to California’s corruption: 1) Individuals frequently fail to report corruption and 2) government data is relatively inaccessible.
Recent reforms in whistleblower protection laws have created more protection for individuals reporting corruption. Already protected from job loss and employer retaliation, whistleblowers are now shielded whether reporting internally or externally. Furthermore, no one acting on behalf of their employers can retaliate against whistleblowers.
Conclusion Corruption in California can occur at every level of government. Public officials have squandered taxpayer dollars through embezzlement, police officers have abused their positions to obstruct justice, and too often, information imbalances permit these types of abuses to continue unnoticed and unchecked for years. Compared to other states, California’s state ethics enforcement and judicial accountability is limited. These statewide inadequacies leave citizens financially and legally vulnerable with regard to public corruption.
To detect and deter public corruption the state and its localities can ensure protections for potential whistleblowers and improve access to government information. Citizens can advocate for both of these changes. Being confident that one will not experience retaliation for reporting crimes by public officials would reduce the fear that incentivizes many to withhold crucial information. Releasing more government information does not detect corruption, but it provides the necessary first steps for external watchdogs and auditors to do so. Systems that leave themselves vulnerable to corruption leave themselves vulnerable to ineffectiveness and distrust among citizens. California’s communities simply cannot afford that vulnerability.
Santa Clara County created it’s own (in house) Public Integrity Unit which itself is a joke because any investigation done in-house is open to more corruption and tampering
The Public Integrity Unit supervises the investigation of cases involving corruption of public officials and employees in their official capacities or in the performance of their duties and initiates criminal charges when appropriate, generally by grand jury indictment. Crimes include theft, embezzlement or misappropriation of public funds; and removal, alteration, destruction or falsification of public records. The unit also enforces the provisions of the Political Reform Act, relating to campaign filings and practices, and the Elections Code. The unit reviews issues relating to the open public meeting law (Brown Act).
For More Information Please Contact:
Public Integrity Unit
70 W. Hedding St., West Wing
San Jose, CA 95110
Phone: (408) 792-2595
You expected a different outcome from “Justified”?
Will we ever know the truth as to what happened? Fact is government such as police, FBI or judges are rarely to never held responsible for their actions. Walter Scott’s murder was caught on video as Officer Michael Slager shot him in the back executing him, then placing his taser by the body. It’s events like this where the government official should face a long prison sentence however not to anyone’s surprise he’s rewarded and set free. Millions of people are victimized each year by a broken system where government uses your tax dollars to victimize and terrorize you. When they commit crimes, murder or abuse it’s business as usual but if you do the same it’s prison or death.
Why do we always want to trust an image, words likes “rights, freedom, constitution and equality”? Especially when there are an obvious two classes, those forced to obey (the public) and those who hide behind law who are “above the law”(government).
Since the shooting, which was captured on video from the FBI’s birdseye view, there have been many theories surrounding the death of La Voy Finicum.
According to the official story, Lavoy Finicum was killed by officers because they had no other choice as he was reaching for a gun in his left pocket. Officials claim they later found a loaded 9 mm semi-automatic handgun in that pocket.
It is evident from the video that Lavoy Finicum never presented the handgun. However, we can clearly see him reaching for his left side.
In a photo of the autopsy report, taken by RT’s Simone Del Rosario at the press conference on Tuesday, and the newly released video, there is a now an alternative reason, outside of going for a gun, as to why Lavoy Finicum was reaching toward his left side — he was shot there.
The newly released video shows that officers and agents opened fire on the vehicle prior to Lavoy Finicum exiting it.
An FBI agent is suspected of lying about firing twice at Robert “LaVoy” Finicum and may have gotten help from four other FBI agents in covering up afterward, authorities revealed Tuesday.
The bullets didn’t hit Finicum and didn’t contribute to his death, but now all five unnamed agents, part of an elite national unit, are under criminal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department. Inspector General Michael Horowitz is leading the independent inquiry.
The remarkable disclosure came as a team of local investigators released findings that two state troopers shot Finicum three times in the back during the chaotic scene at a police roadblock Jan. 26. One bullet pierced his heart, an autopsy showed.
Stop Warrantless Spying on the Public
Did you know hundreds of thousands of your tax dollars are being spent behind your back on equipment to spy on you and your family? What is Stingray
Harris Corporations Stingray surveillance device has been one of the most closely guarded secrets in law enforcement for more than 15 years. The company and its police clients across the United States have fought to keep information about the mobile phone-monitoring boxes from the public against which they are used. The Intercept has obtained several Harris instruction manuals spanning roughly 200 pages and meticulously detailing how to create a cellular surveillance dragnet.
Harris has fought to keep its surveillance equipment, which carries price tags in the low six figures, hidden from both privacy activists and the general public, arguing that information about the gear could help criminals. Accordingly, an older Stingray manual released under the Freedom of Information Act to news website TheBlot.com last year was almost completely redacted. So too have law enforcement agencies at every level, across the country, evaded almost all attempts to learn how and why these extremely powerful tools are being used — though court battles have made it clear Stingrays are often deployed without any warrant. The San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department alone has snooped via Stingray, sans warrant, over 300 times.
The map beloTurns Out Police Stingray Spy Tools Can Indeed Record Callsw tracks what we know, based on press reports and publicly available documents, about the use of stingray tracking devices by state and local police departments. Following the map is a list of the federal agencies known to have the technology. The ACLU has identified 68 agencies in 23 states and the District of Columbia that own stingrays, but because many agencies continue to shroud their purchase and use of stingrays in secrecy, this map dramatically under represents the actual use of stingrays by law enforcement agencies nationwide.
Stingrays, also known as “cell site simulators” or “IMSI catchers,” are invasive cell phone surveillance devices that mimic cell phone towers and send out signals to trick cell phones in the area into transmitting their locations and identifying information. When used to track a suspect’s cell phone, they also gather information about the phones of countless bystanders who happen to be nearby.
Click on the image below for states who have Stingray
THE GOVERNMENT’S USE of a controversial invasive technology for tracking phones just got a little more controversial.
The Anaheim Police Department has acknowledged in new documents that it uses surveillance devices known as Dirtboxes—plane-mounted stingrays—on aircraft flying above the Southern California city that is home to Disneyland, one of the most popular tourist destinations in the world.
According to documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, the Anaheim Police Department have owned the Dirtbox since 2009 and a ground-based stingray since 2011, and may have loaned out the equipment to other cities across Orange County in the nearly seven years it has possessed the equipment.
“This cell phone spying program—which potentially affects the privacy of everyone from Orange County’s 3 million residents to the 16 million people who visit Disneyland every year—shows the dangers of allowing law enforcement to secretly acquire surveillance technology,” Matt Cagle, technology and civil liberties policy attorney for ACLU-NC, wrote in a blog post about the new documents.
Stingrays and Dirtboxes are mobile surveillance systems that impersonate a legitimate cell phone tower in order to trick mobile phones and other mobile devices in their vicinity into connecting to them and revealing their unique ID and location. Stingrays emit a signal that is stronger than that of other cell towers in the vicinity in order to force devices to establish a connection with them. Stingrays don’t just pick up the IDs of targeted devices, however. Every phone within range will contact the system, revealing their ID.
They not only pick up trackable data from phones; Stingrays and Dirtboxes also can disrupt phone service for anyone in their vicinity whose phone connects to the devices. This means that potentially millions of people in Orange County had their phones unknowingly connected to government surveillance devices and may have experienced service disruption as a result. Last year an FBI agent admitted the disruption capability for the first time in a court case involving a Sprint customer.
“Because of the way the Mobile Equipment sometimes operates,” FBI Special Agent Michael A. Scimeca disclosed to a judge, “its use has the potential to intermittently disrupt cellular service to a small fraction of Sprint’s wireless customers within its immediate vicinity. Any potential service disruption will be brief and minimized by reasonably limiting the scope and duration of the use of the Mobile Equipment.”
When it all comes down to it, This is what is destroying America today and has for centuries.
“People before Profit, People over Profit” call it what you wish it all comes down to the same.
Our courts are about profit not justice, judges are about money not about justice. Who ever can buy LAW or has the most money gets justice even if it’s not really fair or moral.
It’s that SIMPLE. Big business is putting profit over the lives of Americans. Big business which by example the WAR INDUSTRY is making profit from killing. They hide their crimes and lies behind words like FREEDOM and fighting for YOUR FREEDOM. In reality its about the bottom dollar and getting the sheep to go to slaughter without them putting up a fight. Share, Like and repost LIKE THEI PAGE https://www.facebook.com/peopleb4profit/
The concept is spreading like wildfire http://www.forbes.com/…/entrepreneur-dale-partridge-launc…/…
About People Before Profit Alliance
The People Before Profit Alliance was formally established in October 2005 by workers from a variety of local campaigns. Its aim is to reverse neo-liberal policies which place wealth creation for the few over the welfare of communities in Ireland.
The Alliance represents a different form of politics, fitting for the 21st century. It sees ‘people power’ and the mobilization of citizens in workplaces, communities and on the streets as the key to bringing change in society. It is the ambition of the Alliance to operate on a 32-county basis and to offer a radical vision for our country.
In addition to its aim of deepening the links between community groups, the Alliance also wishes to explore the potential for electoral politics but it is not interested in electing people who will join coalition governments with the dominant right-wing parties because they have all signed up to the ‘business success is paramount’ ethic.
The alliance opposes neo-liberal policies, including: – the sell-off of Ireland’s natural resources; – the privatisation and run down of public amenities; – the destruction of the environment and our heritage through a flawed planning process; – the prioritization of corporate profit above the environment; – poor public health and labor conditions and standards; – widespread corruption; – the erosion of civil liberties; – tax cuts for the rich and corporations while bin charges and stealth taxes rise for the majority; – the erosion of neutrality through the growing presence of US troops in Shannon (we oppose the use of Irish airports and airspace by the US military); – the mistreatment of immigrants.
The People Before Profit Alliance has 3 TDs, Richard Boyd Barrett, Bríd Smith and Gino Kenny; as well as two MLAs, Gerry Carroll and Eamonn McCann. We also have a number of councilors elected in Dun Laoghaire Rathdown, Dublin City Council and South Dublin County Council.
What We Stand For
Free, Quality, Healthcare for All
No to privatization or a two-tier health system. *Reverse the bed closures and cut backs in local hospitals. For a comprehensive national health service which treats people according to medical need and not money
A Fair Tax System
A fair taxation system to fund public services based on ability to pay, not bin taxes and stealth taxes that hurt the less well off.
Housing for All
An emergency government program to provide social and affordable housing to all that need it.
Decent Public Transport
Cheaper fares, extra buses and major investment in an integrated public transport system to reduce congestion and pollution.
Full union rights and equal conditions for all workers and an end to outsourcing and exploitation of immigrant workers.
Real Local Democracy
Proper funding for local government and genuine public participation, transparency and accountability in planning and development issues.
Protect our Environment
Major investment in sustainable energy, public transport and public recycling infrastructure to deal with global warming and pollution.Real protection for our natural and coastal environment. Use Ireland’s natural resources to benefit the people. Corrib Gas and other vital natural resources to taken into public ownership and used for the benefit of the people.
Keep Ireland out of US led War
End the use of Shannon by the US military for War in Iraq or elsewhere.
Active support for grass-roots community and social movements to bring about real change.
An Alternative Economic Agenda
Annually, before the Budget, the People Before Profit Alliance launch our Alternative Economic Agenda Document, which sets out in more detail the Alliance’s policy in relation to the economy.
If you remember anything the next time you go before a judge in America remember Hillary Clinton and how she was treated by the justice system.
Powerful people such as Police officers, judges, lawyers and government all benefit from the doubt while the normal citizen is often terrorized and abused by our courts. Don’t think this happens? Read the posts on this site, we get hundreds of victims on a daily basis reporting corrupt judges, attorneys, police officers and government. It’s that bad. Do we have a choice? Are we told the truth about the candidates or is everything manipulated by the courts to fit an agenda
Remember these words “Required by law”. Do courts provide fair hearings, honest investigations, unbiased opinions?
The Republican Party is accusing the State Department of “stonewalling” a request to obtain the missing emails belonging to an information technology staffer who helped maintain Hillary Clinton’s private server, suggesting the delay is part of a “cover-up to protect” the Democratic presidential nominee.
New documents, first seen by ABC News, show that the State Department has not responded to a months-old request from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to explain why it has so few email records belonging to the senior staffer, Bryan Pagliano, who worked at the department as a political appointee from May 2009 to February 2013.
During the course of Clinton’s email imbroglio, Pagliano developed a reputation as quiet insider with knowledge of Clinton’s controversial email configuration. He signed an immunity agreement with the Justice Department in exchange for cooperating with FBI investigators examining Clinton’s use of that private email server and has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights hundreds of times in response congressional and legal inquiries. In May, the State Department announced it couldn’t find any evidence that Pagliano had turned over his emails prior to leaving the department, which he would have been required by law to do.
See how this all started via the video and emails at the bottom of the page. How facts of the case against Mr. Crittenden are built on lies and false events
Is the victim Cary-Andrew Crittenden now being extorted or blackmailed by the court to shut him up? Is he being threatened with a gag order as to stop him from exposing the very court and county which caused him to speak out?
The internet is exploding with info about victims of Santa Clara County Corruption with such web sites as Jane and John Q. Public
Written by a legal professional and perfectly stated:
I want it understood very clearly. As a citizen of the United States of America I have the absolute right to not only discuss, but to comment on any trial or other political or content related matter without interference from any Court lacking jurisdiction over me. While Mr. C has not been in touch with me, based upon my reading to the First Amendment and the Constitution of the United States of America he has an absolute right to do so. I practiced law for more than fifty years and therefore to deny him access to an expert or ignoramus to consult is a denial of EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW per se.
It is beyond my comprehension why certain citizens not afforded DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW, and as to others = the Rule of Law does not apply and the Justice System if FOR SALE, TO WIT:
Bribing a judge, a politician, or a public official today does not start and end with handing the corrupt establishment political figure with a white envelope filled with cash. Today it is much more subtle – and it has been more subtle for many years.
In the 1970’s when I was representing Citizen’s Schools in an injunction suit against the Chicago Board of Education in connection with the School Districts threat to keep the Schools open in the event of a strike with recruited neighborhood volunteers, shortly before the case was called on the ladies from the Chicago, Illinois branch of the League of Woman Voters informed me that on that very morning the CPS had hired the Judge’s wife to a very lucrative employment contract. The ladies were irate (justifiably so) at the obvious open and notorious bribe! (I called the Judge out and CPS agreed to not engage in the conduct that was objectionable to my clients – the employment contract to the Judge’s wife was also withdrawn)
Chicago has a history of corrupt election process and the tampering with the elections. It is almost ludicrous to hear the hue and cry that was raised when Mr. Trump called attention to this FACT. I understand the CBS news is advertising that they are this week doing a story on how Chicago’s dead citizens still vote.
All the foregoing is interesting and disgusting in the grosses sense. Vote fraud, no matter whether or not the Establishment political souls acknowledge it or not is a reality and seriously endangers our electoral process. The cancer is one of the proximate causes of ELDER CLEANSING and a danger to not only the elderly and the disabled but every one of us. However, Today’s Wall Street Journal and other media outlets reveal a unspeakable crime that crosses the red line.
You can search the case summary at THIS LINK
Enter “Crittenden” into last name and “Cary” into first name search options:
Further it’s come to our attention that one of the Police officers Samy Tarazi who is supplying information to the court via his own departments police reports has had legal issues before. See the lawsuit against Officer Samy Tarazi which includes the County of Santa Clara Samy-Tarazi-Lawsuit
Above video is San Jose Police Department response to an assault with deadly weapon incident at Markham Plaza Apartments in San Jose. The weapon was large butcher knife.
This was part of a pattern of incidents at Markham Plaza which included another incident where a person was actually stabbed.
Robert Ridgeway was responsible for security & maintaining cameras. The residents turned to me for help because staff was unresponsive to residents concerns about these safety issues.
Detective David Carrollcalled me several times on the phone and threatened me that I would be arrested if I brought these matters to the attention of US dept. of Housing and Urban development & forbade me to not bring attention to this on the internet.
After judge Peter Socrates Manoukian got involved, the crisis at Markham Plaza escalated dramatically into an emergency situation and one of the residents, Robert Moss was found dead almost immediately after the fraud in case 1-12-CV226958 They threatened to arrest me for trying to get him groceries and they claimed that the Cathedral of faith church in San Jose was a terrorist organization because they offered the residents access to job coaching / resume writing workshop.
In attempt to keep out the news media, they accused Dan Noyes of ABC News of threatening to kill one of the residents and this is stated ON THE COURT RECORD to 1-12-CV226958.
Just to give you some background & hope you can understand my frustration.
Santa Clara County Sheriff detective David Carroll, Sergeant Samy Tarazi and assistant DA Barbara Cathcart are recklessly endangering Heidi Yauman and also the residents of this apartment complex.
My job as tenant rights activist is to address these health & safety concerns and keep the public safe.
Cary Andrew Crittenden
September 4, 2015
Detective Carroll made multiple false statements in his first police
report. These false statements were made under supervision of Captain
Here is a video from 4/17/11, which Detective David Carroll insists never
I had left work and responded to Markham Plaza to protect Heidi from a
woman named Kimberly Cano who was running down the hall with butcher knife
trying to kill another resident..
This is the SECOND TIME in months that Ms. Cano had done this.
Management’s failure to address this serious health & safety issue
endangered all the residents.
These incidents are logged with 2 San Jose Police Incident Numbers, A
criminal case number for arrest on first incident and for the second
incident, an unlawful detainer case the following day on 4/18/11. Also on
4/18/11, Heidi received “Violation Notice” on her door alleging that I
resided there. This was a retaliatory act strictly prohibited by FEHA.
I responded to Markham Plaza from 1650 Pomona Avenue where, at the time,
I was working on Federal Court case that involved reverse mortgage /
bankruptcy and because this was a bankruptcy proceeding, all expenses
needed to be logged ,with Bankruptcy Court and U.S. Trustee. These include
the expenses paid to me for the work that I did, when the work was done and
just because Orry Korb insisted that the Mayberry/Kubo record was true, you
cannot explain why completely different accounts are in federal court which
can be confirmed by contacting Hon. Judge Weisblott.
Orry Korb is adamant that this never happened, and insists that the
coalition fabricated the incident to use an an excuse to harass Mr. Korb
with frivolous whistleblower complaint against Larry Kubo.
On several occasions. Detective Carroll called me and specifically
prohibited me from contacting Orry Korb or US Dept. of Urban Development.
In his distorted, perverted, toxic logic, this was supposedly because “Kubo
could not suppress evidence that did not exist'”.
This pattern of events is well well documented and we can prove, not only
that this incident occurred, but also that it was misrepresented on
official court documents confirmed by Mr. Mayberry that on same date, Heidi
We can also prove, and have repeatedly proved that Larry Kubo received
this evidence and yet, Deputy County Counsel Larry Kubo override Heidi’s
answer to unlawful detainer with another which erased the incident. Earlier
on, the whistle blower complaint was received by Acting County Counsel Lori
Orry Korb then became County Counsel and Lori Pegg was appointed to the
bench as Superior Court Judge. Lori Pegg then handled a search warrant
against me based on fabricated nonsense which she personally was aware of
because she, as County Counsel oversaw the Larry Kubo’s role in the scandal.
The findings to the whistleblower complaint were returned claiming that
County counsel Supervisors were not responsible for subordinate attorney’s
while in court, because it was a “separation of powers issue” and that Rule
3-110 therefore did not apply. I was supposed to “accept findings as true”
and deal with the fact that investigation was not Public record
I obtained copy of policy / Procedure via CPRA which stated that pursuant
to Ord. No. NS-300.809, § 1, 3-23-10, the complaint must be handled by
County Executive because Larry Kubo is a County Counsel attorney.
I contacted Mr. Korb and notified him about Mr. Kubos improprieties
involving Suppression of evidence and placing the residents in danger.
Mr Korb adamantly insisted that the knife attacks never happened and that
Code enforcement complaint also, was another hoax irrelevant to the Fair
Employment and Housing Act.. ,
While Mr. Korb was busy manipulating himself, he accidentally admitted
that he had lost documents on Heidi’s ADA accommodations from July 2012 that
CCO must retain for three years.
I explained to Mr. Korb that I did not appreciate being lied to & that he
was placing the residents in danger. I had copies of these same documents
faxed with receipt confirming that they also were received by County
Counsel and scanned to PDF and that I was going to distribute the documents
throughout the coalition
The following Day, Detective David Carroll contacted me by phone and
ordered me not to report any of the crimes at Markham Plaza to HUD or
County Counsel & that I would be arrested if I advocated for Heidi or the
other Markham Plaza residents.
The same acts of fraud used to evict Heidi, were also used to deny Robert
Moss accommodations pursuant to ADA. Robert Moss was found dead shortly
What is astounding to me is that 3 officers have just been charged with
killing an inmate. Detectives vid Carroll and Samy Tarazi’s are just as
dangerous if not more than these officers.
It is people like Public Defender’s office who bent over backwards to
defend these reckless dangerous actions & are completely oblivious to the
wretched pain and suffering caused and the danger you are placing people in.
Think it can’t happen to you? It happens all the time. Jail and so called legal investigations which often take place for no valid reasons are how government and police terrorize the public. What would happen to your home, car and family if you were innocent but accused and locked away for 258 days?
This happened and is still going on for Cary-Andrew Crittenden by the Santa Clara County District Attorney office. With the help of two police officers who apparently have made up their own facts via their own police reports.
More on Santa Clara County Prosecutor Barbara Ann Cathcart who has a history of victimizing people at tax payer expense. SEE HER STORY regarding Henry Sires.
This is common and what happens to anyone who exposes police, judges or government who break the law or commit crime. The problem is who prosecutes the prosecutors? The other issue is when one person commits perjury everyone within that department or government sector ignores it.
Courts and police are out of control abusing their power and terrorizing people to stop them from exposing corruption. While America and the media has it’s attention on Syria more people in America are being terrorized than ever.
New Eastern Outlook provides a daily analysis on the world affairs and events with focus on MENA and Asian countries. HERE
Heidi was fraudulently evicted from Markham Plaza Apartments in October 2012 (Case: 1-12-CV226958) The address for Markham Plaza is 2000/2010 Monterrey Road in San Jose, CA.
The attorney representing Markham Plaza is Ryan Mayberry Bar 232622 Markham Plaza is a HUD Subsidized apartment complex operated by EAH Housing.
The Public Guardian worked with Markham Plaza Property Management to facilitate the fraudulent eviction.
Heidi Yauman was evicted. Not Mr. Crittenden. Police Officer Robert Ridgeway filed a fake court pleading in Judge Manoukian‘s court to defraud Heidi of her housing at Markham Plaza (1-12-CV-226958) Then in 2014, Officer Ridgeway, his wife and Detective Carroll filed a false police report which led to the arrest of Mr. Crittenden on September 16th ( Case: C1493022 )
Involved parties Santa Clara County
Attorney Ryan Mayberry Bar 232622
San Jose Police Officer Robert Ridgeway
Deputy Public Guardian Arlene Peterson Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian Bar 77289
Judge David Cena Bar 83173
Judge Rodney Jay Stafford Bar 54613 (Inactive) Prosecutor Joyce Blair Bar 75849
Deputy Public Defender Jeffrey Dunn Bar 209548
Deputy Public Defender Thomson Sharkey Bar 132950
Public Defender Molly O’Neal, real name Martha Jane O’Neal Bar 150944
Sheriff Deputy Samy Tarazi Badge 2029
Sheriff Deputy David Carroll Badge 2022
Security officer Robert Ridgeway
District Attorney James Leonard Bar 203869
Prosecutor Barbara Ann Cathcart Bar 277999
Probation Officer Michele Martin
Chief of Probation Laura Garnette
Document and Case Numbers Santa Clara County Case C1493022
Detective Carroll false report: 14-182-0167
Preceded Carroll report: 14-287-0293B
Detective Samy Tarazi: 15-056-0301W
Internal Affair Case Number 2015-09
Detective David Carroll was taken off the case after it had been revealed that he lied on a police report and fabricated evidence, then Detective Samy Tarazi replaced him. The internal affairs case for Detective Carroll is 2015-09 and this is under internal affairs sergeant: Alfredo Alanis His email address is Alfredo.email@example.com
Assistant DA James Leonard knew (or should have known) that evidence and reports for the case were , in fact fabricated but he still let them get submitted into court record as if they were “fact.”
There were several other officers involved. The two mentioned above are of the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s department and under the supervision of sheriff lieutenant Elbert Rivera.. (Badge# 1789)
Command officers such as Rivera are responsible for supervising all those beneath them in the chain of command and like Leonard, Rivera knew or should have known that these reports were falsified and evidence was fabricated to this case.
Exposing allegations of false statements on page 3, lines: 21 and 22 in Sheriff dept. Report: by detective Samy Tarazi in which detective Tarazi misclassified evidence, and falsely claimed images were “harassing and annoying” and in violation of restraining order (PC 166(a)(4)
They were not “harassing and annoying”, nor did they violate terms of restraining order. (In order to violate restraining order, images would have had to be of harassing nature and published by Cary-Andrew)
It’s further alleged these false statements ( along with other statements such as in page 3 lines: 3-7) were used to fabricate probable cause for false arrest which occurred on March 24th, 2015.
Probation Officer Michele Martin is rubber stamping fake probation violations based on false and fabricated police report by Detective Samy Tarazi. She then uses the false police report by Detective Tarazi and recommended to the court that Mr. Crittenden be prohibited from using the internet ( So therefore, Michele Martin is trying to prevent Crittenden from exposing corruption and advocating for crime victims )
Detective Tarazi is fabricating reports just like Detective Carroll, but detective Carroll was replaced by detective Tarazi in early February because of publicity and pressure from social media.
Laura Garnette may be involved because as probation chief, she is responsible for the behavior of all probation staff. As Michele Martin’s boss, she should not allow behavior such as rubber stamped fake violations.
They are also FABRICATING FAKE PROBATION VIOLATIONS. ( Demanding Mr. Crittenden give password to Heidi Yauman’s computer which was stolen by Detective Samy Tarazi ) – Heidi is not on probation and is terrified of Sheriff’s department after being terrorized by Detective David Carroll.
The Probation Department is facilitating the stalking and harassment by District Attorney and Sheriff’s Department.
Watch the show below for the entire story and more info
YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING SANTA CLARA DISTRICT ATTORNEY JEFF ROSEN AND DEMANDING THEY DROP CHARGES. Email Jeff Rosen at Jrosen@da.sccgov.org
Also contacting the local New paper Mercury News HERE
People like James Leonard should be disbarred or fired regardless
Janet Phelan Reporter at Large talks about retaliation against Whistle blowers
Former Jailer Helped Plant Jailhouse Informants in Violation of Constitutional Law
Janet Phelan show with more info on the corruption
Santa Clara County Public Guardian Violates Fair Housing Act under HUD Jurisdiction.. The video below shows evidence of how those involved may be connected with an even bigger problem
Santa Clara County Public Guardian Violates Fair Housing Act under HUD Jurisdiction. Deputy Public Guardian: Arlene Peterson facilitated the illegal eviction of Heidi Yauman from Markham Plaza Apartments in San Jose, California. The HUD complaint (345092) was shut down by the Public Guardian
Between San Diego and Los Angeles is Orange County, California. With more than 3 million residents, it’s larger than 21 states. If Orange County were a separate country, its economy would be the 45th largest in the world. Now known for Disneyland, the county may soon be known for having one of the most corrupt justice systems in the world. The width and depth and duration of the corruption truly boggles the mind. A case that should’ve been open and shut has blown the lid off some deep secrets.
On October 12, 2011, Orange County experienced the deadliest mass killing in its modern history. Scott Dekraai killed 8 people, including his ex-wife, in a Seal Beach beauty salon. He was arrested wearing full body armor just a few blocks away. Without a doubt, Dekraai was the perpetrator. A dozen surviving witnesses saw him. He admitted to the shooting early on. Yet, nearly four years later, the case against him has all but fallen apart.
It turns out that prosecutors and police officers committed an egregious violation of Dekraai’s rights—so much so that Superior Court Judge Thomas Goethals shocked everyone and removed the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, and all 250 prosecutors, from having anything more to do with the case.
In Santa Clara County, Cary-Andrew Crittenden was railroaded for a crime he did not commit after exposing what appeared to be several court cases deliberately mishandled by Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian. Crittenden was mis- led by deputy public defender: Jeffrey Dunn who misrepresented the meaning of the statute which Crittenden was accused of violating. Mr. Crittenden pled no contest, believing that he may have inadvertently violated an obscure law.
Crittenden was later re-arrested for publishing a news article about how he was targeted by the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s office. The district attorney retaliated against Crittenden for exposing the prosecutorial misconduct that occurred in case C1493022 and filed a restraining order against Crittenden The district attorney named himself a “victim” on restraining order on the grounds that the news article that was published caused him embarrassment.
Because the district attorney is named “victim”, the Santa Clara County Public defender’s office has prepared motion to disqualify the District Attorney on the grounds that being named as ” victim” creates a conflict of interest issue. The motion recommends the court allow the case to be heard by the California State Attorney General’s office.
The motion is scheduled to be heard in Santa Clara County Hall of Justice on July 31st, 2015 in department 52 before the honorable Judge Michele McKay-McCoy. McKayMcCoy@comcast.net
More reports are coming in about James Leonard harassing people with fake restraining orders and cheating on court cases. This one here, the Todd Burpee case is significant because people coming forward believe that James Leonard mishandled DNA evidence to secure Burpee”s conviction.
Pulled over for traffic violations, Jessica Jauch was held for 96 days in a Mississippi jail without seeing a judge, getting a lawyer or having a chance to make bail. She was charged with a felony based on a secretly recorded video that prosecutors finally acknowledged showed her committing no crime.
Only when she finally got a hearing and a lawyer, who persuaded prosecutors to watch the video, did the case fall apart.
Then, the 34-year-old mother sued, alleging violations of her rights to bail, legal representation, a speedy trial and liberty.
But a federal judge dismissed her case against Choctaw County and Sheriff Cloyd Halford last month, ruling that because she had been indicted by a grand jury on the felony drug charge, none of her constitutional and legal rights were violated.
The outcome has flummoxed civil liberties advocates who have been waging legal battles to reform Mississippi’s criminal justice system, which provides almost no state funding for public defenders.
“I can’t think of a situation where denying someone an appearance before a judge for 96 days after arrest passes constitutional muster,” said attorney Cliff Johnson, who has sued Mississippi localities over pretrial detention and high bails for indigent defendants.
Similar lawsuits have been filed across the country. The American Civil Liberties Union is working state by state to force increased funding for public defenders, particularly in places where court-appointed lawyers depend on stingy local governments and court fees to get paid. Read FULL STORY
This is not an isolated case, in fact this is common. Courts are suppose to be about justice just as police are suppose to serve and protect. However as video technology has exposed the lies and deceit by police the fact that our courts are used against us is being exposed. Most people think going to court means getting a fair hearing by a non-biased judge.
Think again, millions of people are victimized by an unfair, highly biased system based on greed and profit not the lies of justice and equality we expect. The constitution means nothing in our courts, nor do laws when you go up against big money or the system. There are in fact two classes, one which must obey and the other which is above the law.
Lets take Cary-Andrew Crittenden who has spent months in jail for a crime he did not commit. While exposing a dishonest judge Socrates Peter Manoukian Crittenden found out just how dishonest police and our courts can be.